Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Questions about Residential design and 1997 UBC

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Parkerres(--nospam--at)aol.com wrote:
> 
> Thanks to Ralph and Dennis for their support of my realistic "design" approach
> to engineering.
> 
> When one considers that our seismic load on the building is based on highly
> accurate coefficients such as Rw (Is it 6 for a steel frame? Is it 8?  Is it
> 12?  Why not 7.25?  Does the frame know if it's ordinary or special?) and Z
> and I ("We'd better chuck in an extra factor of safety of 50% - after all it
> is a hospital.), we shouldn't get too wrapped up in the precision of the
> analysis that the computer allows us to pursue.  Of course the same gross
> assumptions also apply to the loading for vertical design.  Why is assembly
> live loading 100 psf, why not 80, why not 92?
> 
> All told, for design we always have VERY rough numbers going in.  We should be
> careful not to get too caught up in the analysis and modeling hype of the
> results. It's important not to lose sight of the big picture and the desire to
> design structurally safe and properly performing buildings.
> 
> Bruce Resnick, SE
> Parker Resnick Str. Eng.
> 
VERY GOOD BRUCE !!!!

Donn Wooldridge RA/S
Phoenix, AZ