Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
RE: Design fee guidelines[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: Design fee guidelines
- From: "Bill Allen, S.E." <Bill(--nospam--at)AllenDesigns.com>
- Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 15:15:12 -0800
I really, really want to give you my most sincere response. However, to be precise, my most definitive answer would be "it depends". It depends on how bad you need the work. It depends on how high your overhead is. It depends on the market you are in (geographical as well as project type). It depends on your competition. Here goes anyway (again, all my opinions): If you do not have any competition and you have only one client, your fees should be dictated by you and not your client (what's wrong with THIS picture?). My original point was that ALL of our fees are too low including (especially?) the statutory limit of total A&E fees of 6% for DoD work. Especially considering all the B.S. we have to put up with doing these kinds of projects. We should collectively refuse to do this work for this fee. Based on my experience, my market, etc. a lot of architectural clients can easily find someone to do the kinds of projects I do (medium sized commercial/industrial) for 0.6% to 0.8% of construction costs (plus construction admin). A lot depends on the project. I am currently working on project types where there is a LOT of repetition, so it is difficult to get a good fee with regards to percentage of construciton costs, although based on hourly rates, the fees have been decent. Personally, I'm shocked that engineers will do custom residential work here in CA for anything less than 25% of the total design fee, but it happens all the time. Needless to say, I don't do much residential. Depending on the complexity, etc. I personally believe that 1-1.5% should be our "floor" and we should be insulted by working for a meager 10% of the total design fee (and you're doing construction administration for that?). We have to do too much work (to do a good job that is) and take WAY too much risk for such a small fraction of the design fee. But, just because I say "it ain't right", doesn't mean that someone will underbid you for a project (See: my original point). Good Luck, Bill Allen -----Original Message----- From: Mike Brown [mailto:mike.brown(--nospam--at)cshqa.com] Sent: Monday, November 02, 1998 2:57 PM To: 'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org' Subject: RE: Design fee guidelines Bill: I agree with you 100%. However, lets suppose that I'm in a socialist type situation where I do not have competition and I have only one client. Since I do not have competition, my fees are dictated to me by this client. I would like to know if the fees I have mentioned in my earlier post are too low, too high, or just right for a capitalist environment. What are my colleagues doing to survive? BTW, the fees I mentioned in my earlier post do include construction administration (shop drawing review, site observations as required, answering contractor questions, solving problems that arise in the field, etc.). -----Original Message----- From: Bill Allen, S.E. [mailto:Bill(--nospam--at)AllenDesigns.com] Sent: Monday, November 02, 1998 2:40 PM To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org Subject: RE: Design fee guidelines The following response is merely my opinion and is not intended to offend or flame anyone in particular.. One of the reasons you feel "lucky" to get 1% is that either you are willing to do it for that low of fee or your colleagues (competition) are willing to do it for that fee. Hypothetically, If NO qualified structural engineer would touch a project for less than, say 2%, then you could get 2% on a regular basis. We are our own worst (business) enemy and we would rather worry about graphically beautiful drawings (with shading), ponder rigid diaphram vs. flexible and then decide to do the analysis both ways, perform a time history analysis when it isn't really required, etc. We deserve exactly what we get. Regards, Bill Allen -----Original Message----- From: Mike Brown [mailto:mike.brown(--nospam--at)cshqa.com] Sent: Monday, November 02, 1998 12:38 PM To: 'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org' Subject: RE: Design fee guidelines I'm interested in this information as well. I have seen in the '97 Means for Building Construction Cost Data that the structural engineering fees are 1% min. to 2.5% max. of the project cost. But I got to be honest, I work for an A&E firm and we're lucky if we get 1% of the construction cost (Usually only for complex jobs like hangers and pavilions). Usually we're only budgeted for 10% of the total design fees set by our architects. This usually amounts to about 0.6% of construction costs. Of course the best way to determine structural design fees or any fees for that matter is based on past experience for similar projects. -----Original Message----- From: Bill Coburn [mailto:bauengrg(--nospam--at)bautech.com] Sent: Monday, November 02, 1998 12:03 PM To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org Subject: Design fee guidelines We are attempting to find design fee guidelines with fees determined as a percentage of the construction costs, as designers, construction manager and/or design/build. Obviously a percentage on a parking structure would be higher than an residential or commercial structure. Can anyone suggest a source for this type of information? Naturally these percentages could not be project specific and will be used as a guideline/starting point only. We would also be grateful to anyone who could provide information based on past projects they have been involved with, i.e., cost for services vs. cost of construction. I can be reached directly at Bill(--nospam--at)Bautech.com or Dan(--nospam--at)Bautech.com Thanks in advance.
- RE: Design fee guidelines
- From: Mike Brown
- RE: Design fee guidelines
- Prev by Subject: RE: Design fee guidelines
- Next by Subject: RE: Design fee guidelines
- Previous by thread: RE: Design fee guidelines
- Next by thread: RE: Design fee guidelines