Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Rigid plywood diaphragms

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Good question!  I'd like to know too.

Thor A. Tandy   P.Eng.,  MCSCE
Victoria, BC, Canada
e-mail: <vicpeng(--nospam--at)vtcg.com>

-----Original Message-----
From: Parkerres(--nospam--at)aol.com <Parkerres(--nospam--at)aol.com>
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Date: Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:17 AM
Subject: Re: Rigid plywood diaphragms


>Riddle me this one, Batman.
>
>If the wood diaphragms are so rigid in the new Code, why can't we use them in
>rotation or as cantilevers for more than 15% of the backspan according to the
>current LA City code?  Is this a Code conflict?  Is a soft-story really a
>myth?
>
>Bruce Resnick, SE
>Parker Resnick Str. Eng.