Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: gauge of material

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
For light gage steel, the industry is moving away from gages and toward 
specifying either uncoated mil thickness or mm thickness. There's not an ASTM 
standard for gages (as far as I know), so specifying gages CAN get you into 
trouble, although I have not experienced any problem in the past. Our firm is 
now specifying uncoated mil thicknesses instead of gages based on the 
recommendations of AISI and LGSEA.

Also, because the technology has advanced to allow mills to roll steel to 
small tolerances, most light gage mills roll their shapes to the small side 
of the allowable tolerance. This is happening in the cold-formed steel tube 
industry as well.

William R. Keen, PE
Director, Structural Engineering
Clark Nexsen
Architecture & Engineering
6160 Kempsville Circle, Suite 200A
Norfolk, Virginia 23502
757 455 5800 Fax: 757 455 5638

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Rollo On Behalf Of Robert Rollo
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 1998 9:21 AM
To: 'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'
Subject: RE: gauge of material



btw: does anyone know the origins of gage #s?  seems like i had heard that
it had to do with the number of plies required to develope a given
thickness?  same way with wire gages . . . number of strands that could fit
through a refernce circle?  just a curiosity thing . . .

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	howard black [SMTP:h.black(--nospam--at)cwjamaica.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 24, 1998 10:10 PM
> To:	seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
> Subject:	gauge of material
>
> I happen to be in a conversation today with a few of my colleagues, the
> discussion was centred around the gauge of metals,and the relationship
> between the thickness of the material and the gauge. As we understood it
> the higher the gauge the smaller the thickness and vice versa.The general
> opinion coming out of the discussion was that the thickness of metals had
> nothing to do with the gauge, as a 22 gauge aluminium sheet appeared to be
> thinner than a 26 gauge alusteel sheet.However we are still undecided.
>  please can i get some opinions on this matter.
>
>    Thanking you
>     Howard Black
>     kingston
>     Jamaica
>
>