Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Re: defrag on NT 4.0 again?![Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re: defrag on NT 4.0 again?!
- From: Gil Brock <gil(--nospam--at)rapt.pcdc.com.au>
- Date: Tue, 08 Dec 1998 12:47:24 +1000
Windows NT5 (or Windows 2000 or whatever it is called today) will actually contain a cut-down version of Diskeeper which is the better of the 2. At 16:43 7/12/98 -0800, you wrote: >This technology was pioneered by Symantec (Norton) and they license a >limited version to Microsoft for use in their Op. systems. (As I last >heard) So the NT is just a parred-down Norton. I would go with the Norton >Utils. >Steve > >At 01:01 PM 12/7/98 -0800, you wrote: >>Hi again, >>I was not clear on my last message; >>Any one knows if "Norton Utility" is the better one or "Diskeeper" to >>defrag on windows NT 4.0? >>THANKS, >>JOSEPH HAROUNI P.E. >> >> >> >> >> > > Regards Gil Brock Prestressed Concrete Design Consultants Pty. Ltd. 5 Cameron Street Beenleigh Qld 4207 Australia Ph +61 7 3807 8022 Fax +61 7 3807 8422 email: gil(--nospam--at)rapt.pcdc.com.au
- Prev by Subject: RE: defrag on NT 4.0 again?!
- Next by Subject: RE: defrag on NT 4.0 again?!
- Previous by thread: Re: defrag on NT 4.0 again?!
- Next by thread: RE: defrag on NT 4.0 again?!