Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
RE: OSHA Stairs[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: "'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: OSHA Stairs
- From: Harold Sprague <harold.sprague(--nospam--at)neenan.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1999 14:28:19 -0700
Recently Bill Sherman posed a question about OSHA stair requirements. I had our safety officer (Paul Hamari) pass this on to our OSHA answer guy (Wade Cooper cooper-wade(--nospam--at)dol.gov). Following is his response. Regards, Harold Sprague The Neenan Company harold.sprague(--nospam--at)neenan.com ____________________________________________________________ In reply, first of all it should be recognized that 1910.24(c) does not apply to construction activities, it applies only to general industry activities and those other activities referencing it. Therefore, it is not applicable during the construction or installation of the stairs. It should also be realized that the 1910.24(c) criteria is not applicable to stairs used exclusively for fire exits, private residences, or articulated stairs. In addressing your questions, I have attempted to find out more specifically what is meant by 1910.24(c) by trying to find the original final register which made it a final rule. I have not been able to locate it yet but have our librarian working on it. It is clear however, that this standard existed in the July 1, 1974 edition of 29CFR and is therefore fairly old. Should I be able to find out more able it, I'll pass it to you when received. In the meantime, you should be aware that OSHA allows conformance with current consensus standards, such as the UBC's design requirements, as long as the current consensus standard is as effective as our regulations. Since this UBC design criteria is universally acceptted in the engineering community, OSHA should not have any problems with any stairs which are designed and constructed in accordance with it. Thus, you are encouraged to continue designing using the current UBC criteria as well as other current consensus standards and should not worry about what is meant by 1910.24(c). I regret that I could not find you a more clearer answer as to what was meant by 1910.24(c), however, any information obtained will be forwarded to you. Thanks for your concern to provide a safe and healthy environment. Sincerely, Wade -----Original Message----- From: Bill Sherman [mailto:SHERMANWC(--nospam--at)cdm.com] Sent: Monday, December 14, 1998 1:06 PM To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org Subject: OSHA stairs For fixed industrial stairs, OSHA requires in paragraph 1910.24-(c): "Fixed stairways shall be designed and constructed to carry a load of five times the normal live load anticipated but never of less strength than to carry safely a moving concentrated load of 1,000 pounds." UBC requires exit stairways to be designed for 100 psf or a concentrated load of 300-pounds. If you are installing a stair in an industrial building which could also act as an exit stairway, how is OSHA to be applied? Are the loads given by OSHA to be applied as "working loads" at basic allowable stress or to be compared to yield or ultimate strengths? For a live load of 100 psf, do they really mean to design the stair for 5 times 100 psf? If the stair is not an exit stair, what does "normal live load anticipated mean"? I find the inconsistency in these provisions rather confusing and difficult to apply.
- Prev by Subject: Re: OSHA Stair
- Next by Subject: OSHA: railing with mounted lights
- Previous by thread: RE: water proof for concrete retaining wall
- Next by thread: NEW on the SEAOC web