Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

# Re: analysis of multi-sided, tapered, steel tubes/pipe

• To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
• Subject: Re: analysis of multi-sided, tapered, steel tubes/pipe
• From: "PEC - Lake City" <pec(--nospam--at)isgroup.net>
• Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 10:36:41 -0500

```In the absence of better information, I would be conservative and the
greater drag coefficient, not the smaller one.

-----Original Message-----
From: Vinson, Brian <BrianV(--nospam--at)Valmont.com>
To: 'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org' <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Date: Friday, February 12, 1999 10:31 AM
Subject: analysis of multi-sided, tapered, steel tubes/pipe

>I work for Valmont Industries and we have been recently been faced with the
>question
>of how to analyze 18-sided tapered poles.  We have been designing 8,12, and
>16 sided
>poles using recommendations in the EIA/TIA code for drag/force
coefficients.
>The code does
>not however give a value for 18 sided poles.  Values for the different pole
>types are as follows.
>
>8 sided = 1.20
>12 sided = 1.03 ===> 16.5% lower than 8 sided
>16 sided = 0.72 ===> 43% lower than 12 sided
>18 sided = ?  =====> Does anyone have a recommendation of what to use or
>where I can find some supporting documentation?
>Round = 0.59 =====> only 22% lower than 16 sided
>
>It seems to me that I could make some kind of correlation between the # of
>sides for each type of
>pole and the force coefficients.  After all, the difference is not that
much
>between 16 sided and round anyway.
>Would anyone say it to be unethical for me to use 0.59 for the 18 sided
>pole?
>
>Brian Vinson, EIT
>
>
>
>

```