Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Dilbert's Theorem (architects vs. engineers)

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
I think this is a little ridiculous.

Chris Towne E.I.T.

-----Original Message-----
From: JAKABY(--nospam--at)aol.com <JAKABY(--nospam--at)aol.com>
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Date: Thursday, March 04, 1999 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: Dilbert's Theorem (architects vs. engineers)


>Who could resist an open invitation to snipe at a Plan Checker!  Sweet
revenge
>is at hand!  Well, let's see where should I start....hmm.  So in your
opinion
>engineering is "dry numbers".  Thats' typical coming from an architect
where
>creativity abounds and to hell with practicality.  Where form follows
>function... NOT!   Oh and I suppose the plan checking arena is not dry!?
This
>has to be one of the most boring occupations there is.  Talk about dry.
More
>like parched of any creativity.  As a plan checker do you design anything?
No.
>Been out to the job site lately? I doubt it. Have you produced a drawing
that
>someone actually used to build something from? Can I check it?
>
>DRY NUMBERS!  If thats what you think engineering is you are missing the
>entire picture.  Engineers know more about the built environment than most
>architects could ever dream of.  Thats why engineers are relied upon for
the
>actual design. The structural components are decided upon and designed by
>engineers.  Right down to the aluminum frames of the storefront. The
>difference between architects and engineers is that engineers can actually
>back up what they design with more then concepts, textures and colors.
That's
>the beauty of it.  As an engineer, I can look at a building design, layout
the
>framing, pick a system, conceptualize the lateral bracing and design it.
The
>engineer can determine how every component of the building/structure will
fit,
>what size, how many bolts and more importantly engineers are responsible
for
>the life safety protection of the occupants.
>
>Plan checking doesn't even come close to any form of architectural or
>engineering design.  As a plan checker your job is to check for conformance
to
>building code. Period.   You have no say in the configuration, looks,
>components chosen, location, concepts or anything else. Your area of
expertise
>is the building code.  As a structural engineer I have been in plan check
>situations where I have to educate the plan checker about the code.  This
is
>usually like talking to a brick wall.
>
>As for dry numbers, do you really think we as a society would be able to
span
>the bay or build a high-rise structure without those dry numbers?
>
>So. you consider yourself a hired gun working for the dastardly building
>department.  Thats nice.  As they say whatever floats your boat. Actually,
I
>thought you were the guys with the white hats that ride in to save the day.
>
>Blame it on Dilbert.  I hate to say it, but you asked for it.
>
>Snipefully yours,
>Tom Jakaby, SE
>(DISCLAIMER: The above opinions, conlusions and snipes are intended to be
>taken in a lighthearted way. It is not intended to alienate, offend or
cause
>any consternation.