Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Crane Design; SE v. ME

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
>there are reasons why the work of one discipline is not easily accepted
>by another and what may be perceived as guarding the gate is based in
>lack of understanding of how they each work and what the technical
>expectations/results mean in the lingo of the opposite.
Without beating this to death, I'd say that clear communication with 
people with different skills than ours is our job--no excuses about 'It's 
a CE thing; you wouldn't understand.' Conversely, if I blow off some CE's 
questions about lift load reactions just because he doesn't understand 
enough hydraulics (real hydraulics--spool valves and cylinders ;-> ) to 
suit me, I'm doing myself a great disservice. I keep bringing it up, but 
the first guys who noticed a problem with the KC Hyatt skyways were the 
workers who used them for access. When they said something, the exalted 
engineers replied to stay off if they didn't feel safe. William 
LeMessurier found out about about his wind loading problem because he 
took the time to listen to a student. The idea that we can't convey 
necessary information because it's casting pearls before swine is bad for 
the profession and it's bad for business. 

Christopher Wright P.E.    |"They couldn't hit an elephant from
chrisw(--nospam--at)        | this distance"   (last words of Gen.
___________________________| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania 1864)