Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
ICBO California Legislative Alert[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: ICBO California Legislative Alert
- From: Roger Turk <73527.1356(--nospam--at)compuserve.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 16:18:14 -0500
Yea! California is again at the forefront! STOP IBC NOW! Changing from the 1994 UBC to the IBC 2000 is proceeding too quickly. Changes, which aren't completely understood, are being made to proposals that weren't completely understood, and no one knows what we are getting. There is no reason to proceed so quickly in adopting an "International Building Code," which isn't International and probably won't even be National. The only reason to adopt an "IBC 2000" so quickly is a Madison Avenue, public relations reason for its catchy sounding name. The "Working Draft" of the IBC 2000 was a mishmash combination of the three model codes, the intent of which wasn't really known or used outside the areas of their jurisdiction. Changes have been made to that mishmash resulting in a greater mishmash. Adopting the IBC 2000 without a work-in period is going to result in disasters. We know what happens to understanding when isolated chapters of the UBC have been rewritten such as provisions being left out or reworded in a confusing manner. Now it is proposed to rewrite the entire Code. The last semi-stable UBC is the 1994 UBC. For the most part, changes for that code were made slowly and with considerably more study than is being devoted to the IBC, even with that edition going to the common code format. Then, changes were made to the 1994 edition to not only have a common format, but to progress to a common code and these changes weren't adequately studied. Witness the questions that appear on this list concerning the meaning of 1997 UBC provisions. STOP IBC 2000 NOW! A. Roger Turk, P.E.(Structural) Tucson, Arizona Constantine Shuhaibar wrote: . > I was browing the ICBO when I stumbled on the following. Visit . > http://www.icbo.org/Legislative_Alert/index.html if you are interested. . > "The California State Assembly is considering AB-1626 in its . > Housing and Community Development Committee. AB 1626 would mandate . > by statute the state's adoption of the "most current edition" of IAPMO's . > Uniform Plumbing Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, and the Western Fire . > Chiefs Association's Uniform Fire Code (a document for which no code . > development process exists at this time). Finally, it locks the state into . > ICBO's . > 1997 UBC. The net effect of all of these mandated adoptions is to preempt . > any movement by the state of California toward the single national model . > code family currently being considered for adoption throughout the . > nation."
- Prev by Subject: Re: ICBO California Legislative Alert
- Next by Subject: Re: ICBO California Legislative Alert
- Previous by thread: Re: ICBO California Legislative Alert
- Next by thread: Re: ICBO California Legislative Alert