Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Seismic Upgrade prob. W/97 UBC

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Ben Yousefi, S.E. stated:
"It is not clear why you claim that per 1997 the diaphragm shall be 
considered 
rigid. The definition of diaphragm rigidity has not changed from the 1994 to 
1997 UBC. "

This is true, but the '97 code has taken away the ability to use professional 
judgement in the evaluation of the diaphragm as rigid or stiff. Specific 
seminars were devoted to preparing engineers to compare the rigidity of 
diaphragms and those smaller buildings with aspect ratio's converging on 1 
(between shear walls) will most likely calculate to be stiffer (lower 
deflection) than the code cut off.

Dennis