Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Rigid vs Flexible Diaphragms - Some Comments

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
I do too.

Thor Tandy  P.Eng  MCSCE
Victoria BC
Canada
vicpeng(--nospam--at)vtcg.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Kestner <jkestner(--nospam--at)somervilleinc.com>
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Date: Friday, May 07, 1999 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: Rigid vs Flexible Diaphragms - Some Comments


>Mark:
>
>My approach to this problem is similar to yours, although the projects
>that I have done in California are few and far between and the more
>recent ones we have used local consultants. I typically calculate the
>wall and diaphragm forces for 3 conditions: flexible (simple span),
>semi-rigid (continuous beam) and rigid (distributing shears based upon
>stiffness of the resisting elements and adding the torsional shear
>component). I bound the problem by using the higher forces from each
>analysis. With this approach, I don't need to agonize over whether the
>diaphragm is flexible or rigid. It takes more time to do this, but the
>answer covers all conditions.
>
>This approach can be incorporated on large projects, where the fee is
>bigger, but I can see the difficulty of doing this more complicated
>analysis on small house projects where the fee is minimal.
>
>Jim Kestner, P.E.
>Green Bay, Wi.
>
>
>
>