Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Seismic Upgrade ..... Appeal to those who created the code

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Thanks so much for the response - it does a great deal to put this into 
proper perspective. The only thing that I take issue with is the statement of 
intent to be issue. As you indicated, these issues have already been brought 
up in litigation at the possible expense of the engineer being sued or the 
insurance company. Your comments are very clear and if the statement were 
worded simply as you indicated in your post, there would be no argument. I am 
not sure this can be properly handled in one or two sentences and should 
certainly cover the misconception that originated in the 1994 code (which 
engineers remain liable for after adoption of a new code) and possibly the 88 
code that you and others refered to.

If I might suggest, we have cut this issue apart in such great detail with so 
many good minds with specialties in expert witness work as well as practical 
engineering that it might be usefull to present a draft of the statement to 
this list for review and comment. I think that the professional community can 
adequatly help eleviate the long term liablity without altering the original 
intent of the Seismology committee.

Granted, if I were to be involved you would need to add another chapter just 
to cover my wording, but I am confident that others on this list can help and 
do so expediently.

Thank you so much for the information and your compliments. Although I love 
to be complimented, the truth is that none of the efforts that Shafat or I 
have done would be possible without the engineers who use the service daily. 
These are the truely gifted people. In a conversation I had the other day 
with my wife I realized that one persons opinions are not nearly so powerful 
as a group of opinions. Change is rarely the result of one persons efforts, 
but of all the others who become involved. 

Dennis S. Wish PE