Subject: RE: Strange stuff that I don't understand.
From: Christopher Wright <chrisw(--nospam--at)skypoint.com>
Date: Wed, 19 May 99 09:01:37 -0500
>I think we are
>ethically bound to report structural engineers who are practicing
Bill's right. In Minnesota and in Florida it is a violation of the
Standards of Professional Conduct _not_ to report violations to the
board. The ASME also has similar provisions in its (never enforced)
standards and likely so does ASCE and NSPE. There are also provisions
against false acusations and defamation of other engineers, so having the
cojones to confront someone means you better have proof. That said, it's
possible to have suspected misconduct investigated anonymously, which has
a lot of advantages for everyone.
In the case in question, I'm still convinced the best thing to do is
invite the guy to lunch and bring up the subject of the soft roof and
what's progressed. Lynching the architect, who certainly didn't set out
to do anything improper, won't do anyone any good.
Christopher Wright P.E. |"They couldn't hit an elephant from
chrisw(--nospam--at)skypoint.com | this distance" (last words of Gen.
___________________________| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania 1864)