Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Seismic Upgrade ..... Appeal to those who created the code

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
In a message dated 5/21/99 11:47:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time, Sadre(--nospam--at)aol.com 
writes:

<< PARAGRAPH # 4):
 It is important to consider the relative stiffness of wood shear walls and 
 other veirtical elements of the lateral force resisting system.  An example 
 would be steel moment frames used in combination with wood shear walls.  If 
 the steel frames are quite flexible, the shear walls are likely to carry a 
 large portion of the story shear than would be suggested by a tributary area 
 analysis.  The relative flexibiltiy of steel moment frame may have 
 contributed to damage to tuck-under parking (soft story) buildings during 
the 
 1994 Northridge earthquake [Mendes, 1995].
  >>

I do not think that the last sentence is correct. The damage referred to was 
due to the <lack> of steel moment frame in tuck-under parking type apartment 
buildings. It was common in those days to design apartment or condo buildings 
with tuck-under parking where the open side had only steel columns supporting 
wood or steel beams, and the rear wall of the parking space was assumed to 
resist the diaphragm shear by the "Rotation Principle." I personally observed 
a number of these buildings, and am sure many others have as well.

Oshin Tosounian, S.E.