Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]


[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
From:	SHAR1210(--nospam--at) [mailto:SHAR1210(--nospam--at)]
Sent:	Friday, June 11, 1999 10:38 PM
To:	seaint(--nospam--at)
Subject:	Re: ASD vs. LRFD

Dear Mr. ASD User:
It is no one's job to "Tell you why or show you why" to practice your design
with LRFD.  Being a PE it is your choice to be with LRFD or ASD.....  At
present about 70% or more engineers nationwide are using LRFD?

Isn't anyone going to challenge a statement claiming that 70% of engineers
use LRFD.  That is way out of line based on those I know and from the
comments on this list.  Would "seaint" please poll the list?

Roger Davis
SDS Architects, Inc
205 N. Dewey Street
Eau Claire, WI 54703

-----Original Message-----
From:	Jill T. Shuttleworth, P.E. S.E. [mailto:andeng(--nospam--at)]
Sent:	Monday, June 14, 1999 10:52 AM
To:	seaint(--nospam--at)
Subject:	Re: 4-bolt patterns

Which article on line in Modern Steel Construction do we look at to find
page 9
listed below?  I searched for OSHA but this was not found.
Thank you,
Jill T. Shuttleworth, P.E., S.E.

Scott Melnick wrote:

> For those who don't have the June issue, the entire Steel Interchange
> section is included in Modern Steel Construction's web site
> (
> Scott Melnick
> Modern Steel Construction
> (Also, for those of you who don't currently receive MSC, if you're located
> within the U.S., you can get a free subscription by sending me your name,
> address, telephone, fax and email address. Please also include your day
> month of birth.)
> ----------
> > From: NRoselund(--nospam--at)
> > To: seaint(--nospam--at)
> > Subject: Re: 4-bolt patterns
> > Date: Saturday, June 12, 1999 11:09 PM
> >
> > Status of the OSHA requirement: See the June 1999 issue of Modern Steel
> > Construction, page 9, first Steel Exchange question.
> >
> > Nels Roselund
> > Structural Engineer
> >