To: "SEAOC Newsletter" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Subject: Re: ASD vs. LRFD
From: Christopher Wright <chrisw(--nospam--at)skypoint.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 99 10:19:44 -0500
>These codes will necessarily be ASD in the future because they are ASD now?
>A load factor could not be found for nuclear or lifting equipment? While I
>have no idea whether these codes will ever change and don't care to
>speculate, I'm not sure that I agree with the premise behind the statement.
The reason they're ASD now and likely to remain so is because service
Christopher Wright P.E. |"They couldn't hit an elephant from
chrisw(--nospam--at)skypoint.com | this distance" (last words of Gen.
___________________________| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania 1864)