Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Re: Plwd: Rigid Diaphragm Analysis - Opinions Wanted[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re: Plwd: Rigid Diaphragm Analysis - Opinions Wanted
- From: ASQUILALA(--nospam--at)aol.com
- Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 23:20:41 EDT
> I feel that if you design your buildings for a 20% higher force and your competitors > spend an extra day or two doing calcs, your clients will gradually go >elsewhere. I feel that engineering fees are nothing compared to >construction costs. I recommend (not that I'm some authority) to do the >extra calcs, save your client some money, and you'll also know the code >a little better. If your buildings cost 20% more than the competition, >you'll lose. Providing extra 20% higher force doesn't translate to 20% more costs. Sometimes doubling the force will not even increase the costs by 10%. Assuming that after calculating using the long method you end up with shear equals 275 lbs/ft. providing shear panel with 360 lbs/ft capacity. Then using the simplified method you will come up with 330 lbs/ft, you will then use the same 360 lbs/ft capacity. Even if you need a little bit more stronger shear panel, you might be just adding thickness (it will increase the material cost but not necessarily the labor cost), or you will make the spacing of nails closer (material cost and labor cost will negligibly increase). I happen to be both working in the design engineering and construction industries. My full time work is in construction and my part-time work and moonlighting work are in design and engineering. It is sometimes funny that we (engineers) think that we are trying to save the owners some money by doing more complicated calculations. But in reality our efforts are not that too significant. You are right that engineering fees are nothing compared to construction costs especially when they are in a hurry to finish the job. The faster you finish the design the more savings the contractor or the owner will gain. Engr. Alfonso S. Quilala Jr., P.E.
- Prev by Subject: Re: Plwd: Rigid Diaphragm Analysis - Opinions Wanted
- Next by Subject: RE: Plwd: Rigid Diaphragm Analysis - Opinions Wanted
- Previous by thread: RE: Plwd: Rigid Diaphragm Analysis - Opinions Wanted
- Next by thread: RE: Plwd: Rigid Diaphragm Analysis - Opinions Wanted