Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: EERI Seismic Construction Training Program (response to John Rose)

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Hi Dennis:

I don't recall all of the different organizations that are participating in the
EERI project, but there are several including contractor groups. Perhaps Marjorie
Greene will answer in more detail to Frank McClure's posting. NAHB R/C is not
participating but is cooperating on another apparently similar project.

The EERI project stems from a workshop about two years ago in which a wide segment
of the engineering, contracting, and building dept. groups took a hard look at the
industry needs. The EERI project will lead off with a video, to supplement ICBO's
training videos, which can be distributed to contractors and building depts. for
training.  It was felt that long off-site training sessions weren't practical. At
some point, there might/should be legislation to require at least the job supt. or
lead builder to have seismic construction training, so he can pass the info along
to subordinates.  The details of all of this would be discussed with action needed
at some following stage of the EERI project.

>From Kirk Grundahl's and Frank McClure's posts, it seems that others may be on a
parallel path.  Probably the training aids will be available from several sources.
What is needed then is a program to enable "technology transfer" to take place and
be effective.  Maybe testing or state registration is needed for lead builders; it
was suggested during the workshop, but politics and logistics may get in the way.
This is why support from contractor's organizations was sought when setting up the
EERI project.

John Rose

Seaintonln(--nospam--at) wrote:

> John,
> This is a great start but where is the support from Building Industria
> Association and the other construction industry associations????? How about
> support from NAHB and NAHB-RC.
> My impression is that tract developments, in general, are built under
> stricter enforcment of the construction drawings and with better quality
> assurance than single home developments by small contractors doing less than
> 10 homes a year. In my location, the small developers accounted for more than
> 1,500 homes constructed in my neighborhood over the last ten years which were
> designed by prescriptive methods and yet not strictly in compliance with even
> these minimum provisions. How do we insure that these builders are encouraged
> to improve their knowledge by viewing this information if there is no
> requirement for compliance before they are allowed to apply their skills.
> I think this type of a program should be required in the licensing stage.
> Personally, I don't have as high a regard as most for the independent
> developer since my experience with them has been to avoid extra hardware at
> all costs and to market their product as comparable or of better quality than
> the competition which is engineered. The motivation is an increased profit
> margin.
> Dennis
> In a message dated 7/24/99 11:37:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> jrose36(--nospam--at) writes:
> << EERI is working on a seismic construction training program for building
>  inspectors and contractors.  The first phase is a training video on wood
>  construction, and the important features of construction that provide seismic
>  resistance.  It is being prepared by an experienced contractor who has been
>  involved in training others, with support by ICBO. Guidance on the project
> comes
>  from a task group including SEAOC engineers, ICBO, building contractors, APA
> and
>  other organizations.  For further info, contact Marjorie Greene at EERI in
>  Oakland, CA. It's the first step in a comprehensive program.
>  John Rose/APA
>   >>