Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: ACI 318-99: Comments, Anyone?

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Polhemus <polhemus(--nospam--at)>
To: seaint(--nospam--at) <seaint(--nospam--at)>
Date: Thursday, July 29, 1999 6:36 AM
Subject: RE: ACI 318-99: Comments, Anyone?

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: james korff pe pmp [mailto:seaoc(--nospam--at)]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 1999 10:12 PM
>> To: seaint(--nospam--at)
>> Subject: RE: ACI 318-99: Comments, Anyone?
>> --- Bill Polhemus <polhemus(--nospam--at)> wrote:
UBC has always had it's own RC design provisions, similar to
>ACI but differing in certain essential areas.
>I don't remember clearly, but seem to recall BOCA did reference ACI 318.
>Anyway, that would be quite a departure for those accustomed to UBC,
>wouldn't it?
ACI and UBC have converged considerably over the past few years, so it won't
be much of a departure. The bigger differences have been in seismic
provisions, but even there the differences are slight.