Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Rigid vs Flexible residential diaphragm discussion

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
In a message dated 8/3/99 12:09:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
kdl(--nospam--at) writes:

<< Which code sections ('94 & '97) are being referred to in the disussion 
of..."engineers should have been checking the results of    rigid diaphragm 
analyses on wood framed diaphragms since 1988..."   >>

This would be section 2303 of the 1991 UBC (I could not locate my 88 code) 
and is similar to section 1605.2.1 in the 1997 UBC. 

Dennis S. Wish PE