Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Rigid vs Flexible residential diaphragm discussion

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Sometimes it's considered appropriate to leave a bug in a piece of software 
as long as it does not affect more than a few people. Bean counters are noted 
for this type of decision when trying to resolve recall issues. It's possible 
that Seismology does not see the problems as affecting a large number of 
professionals and this is where the numbers are important.


In a message dated 8/6/99 12:09:10 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
Rhkratzse(--nospam--at) writes:

<< Why does this have to be a popularity contest?  Isn't it enough for just 
 person to stand up and make a cogent argument that "The King has no 
 clothes!"?  So far I have heard many people state that they do not know of a 
 reasonable way to analyze a building with a supposedly rigid but unblocked 
 plywood diaphragm--and NO ONE saying they know how to do it.  Using a 
 stab-in-the-dark method such as 2.5 times blocked diaphragm deflection 
 offends this engineer who has always believed that our work should strive 
 at least 5% accuracy.  
 Ralph Hueston Kratz, S.E.
 Richmond CA >>