Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Wood truss deflection space

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
     It is the obvious solution and therefore probably not  the reasonable
solution that you are looking for but the only way I can think to solve it
is to use boards (size up to you) perpendicular to the plane of the trusses
and joining the trusses. Having short nailers between the boards/beams and
all dropped down to the top of wall height.
Best if panel points are at multiples of 4' of course.

Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Smith <smthengr(--nospam--at)sirius.com>
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Date: Saturday, August 07, 1999 7:47 PM
Subject: Wood truss deflection space


>I am working on a (under)funded housing project with 32 foot wood trusses
>that have a midspan DL deflection of .11" and about .25" TL deflection. The
>lower chords have a segmented "camber" of 1/8" per 10 feet so that the
>trusses do not bear on interior walls. Simpson makes truss clips that allow
>for deflection and a connection of the truss over non-bearing walls as well
>as ceiling sheetrock clips. The sheetrock clips are intended to be
installed
>such that the ceiling sheetrock is not nailed to the bottom of the truss
>within 16" of the non-bearing wall, so the sheetrock actually bends
downward
>to the top of the wall plates. Needless to say the drywallers are not
>enamored with this detail. The drywallers want to install the sheetrock to
>the bottom of the truss at interior walls. My question concerns the
>deflection detail for the ceiling sheetrock. We are looking at maybe
>.14-.16" of LL midspan deflection for a 32 foot span. Are the any
reasonable
>alternatives to avoiding the ceiling sheetrock deflection detail. I know
>that this detail is many times ignored, yet others are steadfast in
>declaring its importance.
>
>Regards,
>
>Jeff Smith
>
>