Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Re: Wood: Are you as confused as I?????[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: Re: Wood: Are you as confused as I?????
- From: Seaintonln(--nospam--at)aol.com
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 19:35:57 EDT
In a message dated 8/18/99 10:24:45 AM Pacific Daylight Time, FSRahbar(--nospam--at)aol.com writes: << Dennis: I totally agree with you. However, City of Los Angeles, has had his own Building Code for ever and they did what ever they thought was right. The information I had received from Mr. Dang at The City, was not his opinion or his interpretation of the code. It was City of Los Angeles Policy. At least, this was what I was told. There is a big difference between someone's interoperation of the code and the City Policy. Anyway, I have a feeling that all of us will be dragged into court and behind bars if the "Code Writers" don't get their act together. F S Rahbar, S.E. >> Careful here, I only know of one instance in my time in Los Angeles where the city code was less restrictive than the published state code. This was in the design of Unreinforced Masonry. In the pier design section, the City of Los Angeles allowed all interior partitions to be considered while the state code eliminated the consideration of interior partitions and adjusted the rocking shear formula's to be limited. However, I think that this was because the code originated from the work done in the City of Los Angeles under their RGA 1-91 provisions. This is a case where the code was published after the work was completed in LA based on an ordinance and not a mandatory state measure. Each of the structural provisions that I recall have been in excess of the UBC minimums and not less than. I think this is an important point simply because too many individuals are under the impression that if they comply with the building official they are satisfying the code which is not the case if the building official agrees to something less than minimum required in the published code. If you have to protect your butt, it's better to keep that rule of thumb in mind than be lead down the wrong path by a well intending city employee who will never need to answer for his or her mistake. I'm not trying to flame building department personel by any means, but there are well intended individuals who believe strongly in the science and wish to set rules without understanding the liability issues. It's the engineer of record that ultimately takes the fall. regards Dennis
- Prev by Subject: Re: Wood: Are you as confused as I?????
- Next by Subject: Re: Wood: Are you as confused as I?????
- Previous by thread: Re: Wood: Are you as confused as I?????
- Next by thread: Re: Wood: Are you as confused as I?????