Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: re/ Fp Values

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Bill-

Just curious.  How did he want you to do the "opening" analysis?  Or did he
know what he wanted?

Bill Cain, SE
Oakland, CA


	-----Original Message-----
	From:	Bill Allen [SMTP:Bill(--nospam--at)AllenDesigns.com]
	Sent:	Thursday, September 16, 1999 10:52 AM
	To:	seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
	Subject:	RE: re/ Fp Values
	<snip>

	Getting a little ahead of myself, I recently got into an argument
with a
	plan checker with regards to the design and detailing of openings in
shear
	walls (see Fig 23-II-1). After twenty something years of structural
	engineering, I thought I knew how to do this. Not according to the
plan
	checker. For the horizontal check/connection, I calculated the drag
force
	based on the shear above the opening and the shear below the
opening. I
	provided blocking and strapping to accommodate this drag force. For
the
	vertical component (continuous framing member-king stud), I
calculated the
	axial force by multiplying the shear force in the pier by the pier
height
	and dividing by the pier width. This is like: T=C=M/d. I divided
this force
	by the distance from the top of the pier to the top plate to give a
distance
	in which this "chord force" could be transferred into the panel
above the
	pier. I then provided boundary nailing that would transfer this
force. As
	shocking as this may seem, the plan checker did not think that this
was an
	adequate "Design for force transfer ... based on a rational
analysis" (see
	2315.1, 5th paragraph). Sheesh. At this point in my career, I no
longer am
	interested in getting into a debate with the plan checker. I just
want to
	finish the job and move on to the next one. It would have been nice
to have
	an example (such as one that may be included in an upcoming design
	manual???) to reference.

	<snip>

	Bill Allen, S.E.
	ALLEN DESIGNS
	Laguna Niguel, CA