Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: wind gust response

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
I think Bill means 5.5 second period, not frequency (Hz).

regards

Liao Yang P.E.

-----Original Message-----
From: Aya-Welland, Ruben A. [mailto:RAyaWelland(--nospam--at)tt-cbm.com]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 2:26 PM
To: 'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'
Subject: RE: wind gust response


By preliminary, I meant that it was based on the preliminary results of my
model. Sorry for the confusion in wording. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Bill Polhemus [SMTP:polhemus(--nospam--at)insync.net]
> Sent:	Monday, September 27, 1999 4:49 PM
> To:	seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
> Subject:	RE: wind gust response
> 
> > > I have a building whose preliminary fundamental frequency
> > is rather high
> > > (about 5.5 seconds for a 30 story building).
> 
> Not to pick nits, but should this be called the "fundamental period" of
> the
> building?
> 
>