Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: wind gust response

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Yes --- again, a goof on my part. I will check my messages more thoroughly
in the future before I send them.

Thanks!

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Yang, Liao/ANC [SMTP:LYang(--nospam--at)CH2M.com]
> Sent:	Monday, September 27, 1999 5:35 PM
> To:	'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'
> Subject:	RE: wind gust response
> 
> I think Bill means 5.5 second period, not frequency (Hz).
> 
> regards
> 
> Liao Yang P.E.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aya-Welland, Ruben A. [mailto:RAyaWelland(--nospam--at)tt-cbm.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 27, 1999 2:26 PM
> To: 'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'
> Subject: RE: wind gust response
> 
> 
> By preliminary, I meant that it was based on the preliminary results of my
> model. Sorry for the confusion in wording. 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	Bill Polhemus [SMTP:polhemus(--nospam--at)insync.net]
> > Sent:	Monday, September 27, 1999 4:49 PM
> > To:	seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
> > Subject:	RE: wind gust response
> > 
> > > > I have a building whose preliminary fundamental frequency
> > > is rather high
> > > > (about 5.5 seconds for a 30 story building).
> > 
> > Not to pick nits, but should this be called the "fundamental period" of
> > the
> > building?
> > 
> > 
> 
>