Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Salary Survey

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
>I don't think this is a very good example. Had "laissez faire" been a part
>of this process, the nuclear power industry would still be alive and viable
I've been around the nuke business myself, and I feel very strongly that 
a laissez-faire attitude allowed too many utilities who couldn't pay the 
technical dues into the nuke business. They got nuke plants they couldn't 
build and run efficiently. The three best run nuclear power organizations 
are the US Navy program and the French and Japanese systems--all strictly 
government operations. France and Japan get most of their power from 

I'll go this far with the bureaucracy point--the US program seems to have 
substituted procedure for technical leadership, unlike the way Rickover 
ran the Navy program. I daresay this results from a lack of technical 
commitment with utilities whose chief interest is mailing out light bills 
and sub-contracting responsibility. An outfit that goes nuclear with an 
attitude of, 'How do we just get by?' instead of 'How do we make this the 
best operation there is?' is in trouble. In fact that attitude pretty 
much guarantees a bureaucracy focussed on corner-cutting instead of 
technical leadership. I think people would have been a lot more willing 
to trust the nuclear industry had they sensed a clear commitment to 
safety and efficiency, and I doubt the US radwaste disposal program would 
be such shambles with someone of Rickover's stature in charge. But that 
isn't the way we do things any more. 

Christopher Wright P.E.    |"They couldn't hit an elephant from
chrisw(--nospam--at)        | this distance"   (last words of Gen.
___________________________| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania 1864)