Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Cost for review of drawings

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
I think peer review of projects in California is for a different reason than
review of Sewerage Treatment Plants. Since structural design of this kind of
facility is somewhat different from above ground (vertical structures)
specific experience is required. For example, small and large pumps may
impose vibrations on structures that need to be accounted for, design of
concrete and reinforcement for this kind of corrosive exposure follows
somewhat different criteria than for typical buildings, etc.

As far as the fee is concerned, I believe the structural fee for design of a
treatment plant facility is generally higher than design of building
structures in similar regions. Design review is not much different than
performing the actual design, except that it should take less time than the
original design. Perhaps 10% to 15% of original design fee should be
adequate?



-----Original Message-----
From: David Handy [mailto:dhandy(--nospam--at)trg.ca]
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 1999 7:56 AM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
Subject: Cost for review of drawings


I have been asked to review a large sewage treatment plant facility for a
contractor in the Middle East. Assuming the design was done reasonably
well, what would be the cost to provide structural eng. services to review
the drawings to ensure it has been done right. A complete set of drawings
is available. Construction cost of facility is roughly $30 million US. It
seems that peer review is very popular in the CA area according to threads
I have read on the list. It is not so normal in my area. Is there a typical
percentage fee used for this kind of work.

David Handy, P.Eng
Ontario, Canada