Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: DYNAMIC ANALYSIS VS STATIC ANALYSIS

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Without getting into code particulars, the UBC is more often employed in
high seismic risk zones and the BOCA is more often for the lower risk zones.

Greg
-----Original Message-----
From: Arvind K. Bisarya <arvind_bisarya(--nospam--at)mk.com>
To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Cc: bisarya(--nospam--at)aol.com <bisarya(--nospam--at)aol.com>
Date: Tuesday, October 19, 1999 3:30 PM
Subject: DYNAMIC ANALYSIS VS STATIC ANALYSIS


>
>
>         I  KNOW  THAT  IT  IS  A  U. B. C.  COUNTRY, BUT SOMEONE  CAN
>HELP  ME OUT  ON  A QUESTION  ABOUT  BOCA99.
>
>        U.B.C.  SECTION  1631.5.4  PROVIDES  FOR  REDUCTION  OF  ELASTIC
>RESPONSE  PARAMETERS  FOR  DESIGN.  THERE  IS  NO  SUCH  PROVISION  IN
>BOCA  1999. DOES  ANY  BODY  KNOW  WHY??   DOES  THAT  MEAN  I  CAN  REDUCE
> THE  BASE  SHEAR  AS  MUCH  AS  I  WANT ,  IF  MY  PERIOD  IS  VERY  VERY
>LARGE  ???  OR  DO  I  STILL  HAVE  TO  DESIGN  FOR  STATIC  BASE  SHEAR.
>THANKS  VERY  VERY  MUCH  IN  ADVANCE.
>
>           BISARYA(--nospam--at)AOL.COM
>          ARVIND  BISARYA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>**This message was created in BeyondMail. Please ignore the ATTRIBS.BND
>attachment if you are not a BeyondMail user.
>
>