Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]
rho or omega?
[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]- To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
- Subject: rho or omega?
- From: Darrell Hambley <dth(--nospam--at)red.primextech.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 10:46:25 -0700
I submitted a set of calculations for a residential home and they said I need to show what I used for rho (equation 30-1 in '97 UBC). I used equation 30-2 with omega instead because it seemed a worse case (2.8 for omega instead of a default value of 1.5 for rho). Now I'm confused as I read the UBC further. If anyone can answer a few of these questions I'd be really grateful! 1. When do you use 30-2 instead of 30-1? "E" (in equ 30-1) is for elements according to 1630 but, according to 1630.3.1 omega (in equ 30-2) is for "specific elements" also. They're both for elements. What's the difference? 2. Now please look at 1632, equ 32-1(elements). Fp=4*Ca*I*W which is 1.44W in zone 3. That's a big number! Paragraph 1630.1.1 defines Eh as equal to V or Fp. I don't like that word "or". Which one do I use? Is it implied that one value is for the structure as a whole and the other is for a specific element? 3. The 1.4 factor... E/1.4 from 1612.3.1 will lower the value of E of equ 30-1, (E=pEh) but now equation 30-2 is still larger so question 1 above still confuses me... When do I use equ 30-2? Thanks for any help you can offer. Signed, Darrell Hambley PE or Confused in Seattle
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: rho or omega?
- From: Paul Crocker
- Re: rho or omega?
- From: Robert Shaffer
- Re: rho or omega?
- Prev by Subject: RE: Rho in Diaphragms
- Next by Subject: Re: rho or omega?
- Previous by thread: RE: FOUNDATIONS: Need Reference to Article in ENR(?) Re Foundatio n Underpinning Technology
- Next by thread: Re: rho or omega?
- About this archive
- Messages sorted by: [Subject][Thread][Author][Date]