Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Digital Camera

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Compact Flash card standardization is making this way of saving images much
easier (as is the USB connection). My main objection has to do with the cost
of the Flash Card (about $75.00 for a 16Mb disk for my Windows CE PDA at
Best Buy).
The second problem with Flash Cards is having to have a number of them when
At 640x480 resolution (generally pretty good for small images or viewing on
a screen), the Sony Mavica's will store almost 50 images on a single 1.4Mb
floppy. The cost of the floppy is around $0.39 and the availability is good.
Need to travel without a computer? No problem and you can simply accumulate
On the downside, the FD's will hold more of the low resolution images but
Sony does not support it and other camera's take up much more resolution
that fewer images can get on a Flash Card.
I have had very little trouble with resolution on the Sony - especially for
business use. I know I can't get Photo Quality on an 8x10 glossy from this
camera, but that is not why I bought it.
I organize my shots digitally and normal screen resolution is closer to 73
dpi with means that you would be hard pressed to see the difference of a
digital photo blown up on a computer screen and that of a higher resolution.

I think that the Floppy camera has been a success simply by convenience.


-----Original Message-----
From: Polhemus, Bill [mailto:wlpolhemus(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 6:04 AM
To: 'seaint(--nospam--at)'
Subject: RE: Digital Camera

I disagree with this.

In the first place, the Kodak cameras, which use the CompactFlash memory
card, can hold a great many more photos without having to juggle disks
which, in the field, is a great thing.

Second, the newer cameras have a USB port, which makes hookup and download
easier and faster.

Better still, though, I bought a SanDisk CompactFlash card reader (USB
version) for about $55 at Office Depot. I just keep this small device hooked
up to the computer at all times, then simply insert the card I want to read
when necessary. The computer "sees" the reader as simply another disk drive,
so to download, I just drag and drop the photo image icons wherever.

I think the Kodak cameras are the most reliable and affordable of the bunch.
I recommend them highly, along with the SanDisk card reader.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Burch [mailto:rburch(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 1999 7:29 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)
Subject: Re: Digital Camera

James Lin wrote:
> Can anyone recommend the digital camera (name & model)
> to be used in the construction field.
> Thanks in advance,
> James Lin
> IDS, Inc.

My only comment is to recommend that you get a model that stores the
pictures on a standard floppy disk. We have a Kodak model in our office
that uses some other type card for memory. It is a real pain to have to
get to the back of the computer to hook up the cable every time you want
to download pictures. I guess we could buy extra cables so everyone
could leave them hooked up, but we haven't yet.