Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...
RE: Digital Camera[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: Digital Camera
- From: "SEConsultant" <seconsultant(--nospam--at)earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 08:49:37 -0800
Bill, Compact Flash card standardization is making this way of saving images much easier (as is the USB connection). My main objection has to do with the cost of the Flash Card (about $75.00 for a 16Mb disk for my Windows CE PDA at Best Buy). The second problem with Flash Cards is having to have a number of them when traveling. At 640x480 resolution (generally pretty good for small images or viewing on a screen), the Sony Mavica's will store almost 50 images on a single 1.4Mb floppy. The cost of the floppy is around $0.39 and the availability is good. Need to travel without a computer? No problem and you can simply accumulate disks. On the downside, the FD's will hold more of the low resolution images but Sony does not support it and other camera's take up much more resolution that fewer images can get on a Flash Card. I have had very little trouble with resolution on the Sony - especially for business use. I know I can't get Photo Quality on an 8x10 glossy from this camera, but that is not why I bought it. I organize my shots digitally and normal screen resolution is closer to 73 dpi with means that you would be hard pressed to see the difference of a digital photo blown up on a computer screen and that of a higher resolution. I think that the Floppy camera has been a success simply by convenience. Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Polhemus, Bill [mailto:wlpolhemus(--nospam--at)sbinfra.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 6:04 AM To: 'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org' Subject: RE: Digital Camera I disagree with this. In the first place, the Kodak cameras, which use the CompactFlash memory card, can hold a great many more photos without having to juggle disks which, in the field, is a great thing. Second, the newer cameras have a USB port, which makes hookup and download easier and faster. Better still, though, I bought a SanDisk CompactFlash card reader (USB version) for about $55 at Office Depot. I just keep this small device hooked up to the computer at all times, then simply insert the card I want to read when necessary. The computer "sees" the reader as simply another disk drive, so to download, I just drag and drop the photo image icons wherever. I think the Kodak cameras are the most reliable and affordable of the bunch. I recommend them highly, along with the SanDisk card reader. -----Original Message----- From: Rick Burch [mailto:rburch(--nospam--at)conterra.com] Sent: Monday, December 13, 1999 7:29 PM To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org Subject: Re: Digital Camera James Lin wrote: > > Can anyone recommend the digital camera (name & model) > to be used in the construction field. > > Thanks in advance, > > James Lin > IDS, Inc. > My only comment is to recommend that you get a model that stores the pictures on a standard floppy disk. We have a Kodak model in our office that uses some other type card for memory. It is a real pain to have to get to the back of the computer to hook up the cable every time you want to download pictures. I guess we could buy extra cables so everyone could leave them hooked up, but we haven't yet.
- RE: Digital Camera
- From: Polhemus, Bill
- RE: Digital Camera
- Prev by Subject: RE: Digital Camera
- Next by Subject: Digital Camera use in Forensics
- Previous by thread: RE: Digital Camera
- Next by thread: Digital Camera use in Forensics