Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: new SEAOC seismology web page

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Let's see? Where did I say that it shouldn't be corrected? Of course it should. I was just giving you some background, not defending an obvious oversight of an earlier committee.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Allen [mailto:Bill(--nospam--at)]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 1999 4:22 PM
> To: seaint(--nospam--at)
> Subject: RE: new SEAOC seismology web page
> "Almost right" meaning that it is INTENTIONAL that we poor structural
> engineers are faced with doing the redundant calculations for 
> R=4 for no
> apparent benefit to life safety?
> Shouldn't this be corrected?
> What's wrong with this picture?
> Bill Allen, S.E.
> Laguna Niguel, CA