Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: new SEAOC seismology web page

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
O.K., so back to formulating a "concensus" to submit to the seismology
committee.

What do you, Mark, recommend we do with regards to this particular issue?


Bill Allen, S.E.
ALLEN DESIGNS
Laguna Niguel, CA


=>-----Original Message-----
=>From: Mark E. Deardorff [mailto:MarkD(--nospam--at)DandDEng.com]
=>Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 1999 4:51 PM
=>To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
=>Subject: RE: new SEAOC seismology web page
=>
=>
=>Let's see? Where did I say that it shouldn't be corrected? Of
=>course it should. I was just giving you some background, not
=>defending an obvious oversight of an earlier committee.
=>
=>> -----Original Message-----
=>> From: Bill Allen [mailto:Bill(--nospam--at)AllenDesigns.com]
=>> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 1999 4:22 PM
=>> To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
=>> Subject: RE: new SEAOC seismology web page
=>>
=>>
=>> "Almost right" meaning that it is INTENTIONAL that we poor
=>structural
=>> engineers are faced with doing the redundant calculations for
=>> R=4 for no
=>> apparent benefit to life safety?
=>>
=>> Shouldn't this be corrected?
=>>
=>> What's wrong with this picture?
=>>
=>> Bill Allen, S.E.
=>> ALLEN DESIGNS
=>> Laguna Niguel, CA