Wood Fire Rated Wall Assembly F'c reduction[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: Wood Fire Rated Wall Assembly F'c reduction
- From: "Jeff Albert" <jeffa(--nospam--at)kpff.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2000 16:51:13 -0800
The Uniform Building Code requires that the design stress for studs be reduced to 78 percent of allowable F'c for all 1-hour rated walls. This appears in a footnote #18 for Table 7-B.
First, my question is whether other engineers in California, and other UBC states are applying this provision to their wood design. Also, how have building officials responded / reacted to designs not using the reduction. I will note that it is my belief that a reduction is unnecessary, and that designs done without using the reduced values are safe. But this brings me to my second question.
If this provision is being waived away, what are the liability concerns. I am particularly interested in projects that are condominiums. With the state of condo associations these days, it seems to me that not adhering to a specific provision in the code leaves the design open for problems if reviewed at a later date.
Finally, is anyone aware of any new studies, or fire assembly testing, etc. that is currently being done that might address this issue. My understanding of the reason for this provision is due to a change in allowable perpendicular to grain design stress values which were not reflected in the original fire assemblies tested. Therefore, a reduction factor was applied which basically brought you back to where you were before the increased values.
I look forward to reading your responses.
KPFF Consulting Engineers
- Prev by Subject: RE: Wood Connection Question
- Next by Subject: Re: Wood Fire Rated Wall Assembly F'c reduction
- Previous by thread: Re: Report on Wood Diaphragm Issues
- Next by thread: Re: Wood Fire Rated Wall Assembly F'c reduction