Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: criteria for retrofit of existing structures, FEMA 273 and FEMA 343

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Ghassem and others,

Before you consider using FEMA 273, you might want to look at a FEMA 343 
Report "Case Studies: An Assessment of the NEHRP Guidelines (FEMA 273) for 
the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings."  Unfortunately, this important 
report, which is based on the over two million dollar Building Seismic Safety 
Council Case Studies Project and written by Andrew Merovich, is still in 
press.  When it is available, you can obtain a free copy from the FEMA  
Publications, Telephone 800-480-2520.

It is not clear why this important FEMA 343 Report is not readily available 
and is still "In Press", except to comment that FEMA 343 raises some very 
important issues about the technical adequacy of the some of the FEMA 273 
Guidelines.  This FEMA 343 Report was delivered, camera ready, to FEMA on 
October 1, 1999.

When you obtain your copy of FEMA 343, turn to page 89, Section 6.2, 
Technical Adequacy, Item T1, which addresses the problems with how FEMA 273 
inadequately attempts to deal with overturning.  In Section 6.2, Technical 
Adequacy, Item T1 it states:  "The treatment of overturning in the linear 
procedures produces results that are much more severe than observations of 
past building performance imply are necessary.  The Guidelines provides a 
sidebar that can be used to adjust overturning demands to levels consistent 
with those of new construction designed by current code procedures.  At a 
minimum, the sidebar should be modified to include a reduction in earthquake 
demand consistent with the removal of coefficients C1, C2, and C3.  This 
modification should result in overturning demands that are consistent with 
current codes for new constructions, BUT IT DOES NOT ADDRESS THE RESULTING 
INCONSISTENCY IN DEMAND FORCES ABOVE THE FOUNDATION INTERFACE AND THOSE 
REDUCED FORCES BELOW IT."  (Emphasis added.)

In other words, following the FEMA 273 Guidelines, the forces at the base of 
the superstructure connections to the top of the foundation and not in 
equilibrium with the forces at the foundation-soil interface.

The primary question then is how does a design professional design the 
foundation system when the forces at the top of the foundation are not in 
equilibrium with the forces at the foundation-soil interface? 

Hopefully, the ASCE/FEMA 273 and the ASCE/FEMA 310 Standards, which are now 
under preparation, by the ASCE Standards Committee on the Seismic 
Rehabilitation of Buildings, will provide adequate guidance on how to address 
the problem of overturning following the FEMA 273 Guidelines.  For additional 
information concerning ASCE/FEMA 273 and ASCE/FEMA 310 Standards log onto the 
Degenkolb Engineers web site: www.degenkolb.com/ascefema273.




Frank E. McClure    January 7, 2000