Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Dynamic Analysis Question

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Christopher Wright has made a good point in his recent post.

-----Original Message-----
...That tells me that each part contributes both stiffness and mass
(including rotary inertia) to the
response of the other. If this were not the case, you'd expect the results
of the combined model to show only the individual responses.
-----Original Message-----


The reason for a two part analysis is to simplify analysis of structures
such as wood frame housing over concrete pedestals.  If I strictly read
UBC-97 section 1630.4.2.2  (" The following two-stage STATIC analysis
procedures may be used..."  [my CAPS]), I question why there was a two-stage
dynamic analysis performed at all.

It is my interpretation that the intent of the code is to allow a two-part,
simplified (analytically) analysis for qualified structures and expects a
full structure model for a dynamic analysis.


Greg Varney, P.E.
KPFF Consulting Engineers

gregv(--nospam--at)kpff.com    (206)-622-5822   voice     (206)-6228-130    fax