Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Circular Concrete Tanks without Prestressing

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

	Will-Seal 200 is imported and generally not stocked, but it is
designed to resist a head of water.

Jeenie Joint:
	Could you route the joint to accommodate it?

	Consider the Sikadur Combiflex if the joint is active or SikaSwell S
if the joint is not active or the SikaFix HH for the expanding polyurethane
chemical grout.
	I have not had much experience with the Hydrotite, but I have had
the same reservations as you have with the swelling materials.  
One joint that I did about 5 years ago used:
	1.	A routed joint which also served as a shelf for the
	2.	Will-Seal 200, which I used as a backer rod
	3.	Sika 2 part polyurethane sealant.  
	It has never had a leak problem since.
Harold Sprague

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Sherman, William [SMTP:ShermanWC(--nospam--at)]
> Sent:	Tuesday, February 01, 2000 10:52 AM
> To:	'seaint(--nospam--at)'
> Subject:	RE: Circular Concrete Tanks without Prestressing
> Harold, thanks for your input.  You mentioned the following products:
> > There are adhered expansion joints like the Jeanie and Will 
> > Seal...
> I have a relatively old catalog for Will-Seal by Illbruck, Inc.  It
> appears
> to be intended mainly for above grade sealing and the specs say to test it
> only for 2-inches of water.  Has it since been tested for higher heads
> under
> full hydrostatic head? 
> We have used the Jeene joint sealing system on wider joints, but the
> smallest joint it is made for is 3/4-inch.  I am currently trying to seal
> 1/2-inch joints. 
> > Another solution that would seal smaller cracks is injecting 
> > Sikafix.  This product expands upon contact with water and remains 
> > resilient.  
> Sikafix is a polyurethane grout, which is similar to the chemical grout
> injected into such joint sealing systems as the "Injecto Tube" by DeNeef.
> This system is primarily intended to be used in construction joints - a
> permeable tube is cast into the construction joint and chemical grout is
> injected into the joint after it has been constructed, filling the tube
> and
> any voids with water reactive grout.  I have used this system in expansion
> joints before - sometimes with success but a recent project has run into
> leakage problems with this system in an existing expansion joint.  I'm not
> sure if it is a "system failure" or an installation problem.  So far this
> is
> the best solution I have found, but I am still searching for other
> solutions.
> I am currently looking into a similar detail using Greenstreak Hydrotite
> expansive "rope".  A circular rope of water reactive material could be
> precompressed like a backer rod and inserted into the joint.  Again, the
> material is primarily intended for construction joints, but I've heard
> that
> it may have been used in an expansion joint at one project - I am still
> trying to get more data on that.  
> These expansive grouts also have differing properties.  The injection
> grout
> must be wetted at installation and expands to form a closed cell
> polyurethane foam which remains permanently expanded.  The expansive rope
> expands and contracts with wetting and drying cycles and takes some time
> to
> react (i.e., could leak initially until becomes fully reacted).  Currently
> I
> prefer the injection grout which is intended to expand and form a
> compression seal as well as have bonding and elongation capabilities.