Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: ASD vs simple test

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

You're right.  I was trying to cut tons out of the building.  However, I
don't see that as a mistake.  I appreciate the AISC recommendations on
how to save steel construction dollars via correct use of detailing, and
all those other tips.  Those are good tips!  I read through them
yesterday with the link you provided.  However, if I start out with a
lighter building and then apply the tips, I can't help but be more
economical.  I'm not looking to go so light that I'm adding stiffeners
or doubler plates or anything like that.  We're talking good sized
members for a heavy industrial building.  

I guess I was expecting something dramatic with LRFD since it is a big
topic of discussion.  It just wasn't a big deal (and I still had to
calculate the service loads to get my deflections).  I'm sticking with
ASD until I am forced to switch or I can see a savings for me or my

Michael Ritter, PE

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Charlie Carter [SMTP:carter(--nospam--at)]
> Sent:	Thursday, February 03, 2000 10:19 AM
> To:	'seaint(--nospam--at)'
> Subject:	RE: ASD vs simple test
> I'm assuming your motivation to check into LRFD was maybe to see if
> you could cut tons out of the structure. This is a mistake in my
> opinion, because least weight is not synonymous with least cost. The
> details are what drives the cost. Labor, not tons!