Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Seismic Provisions

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Evan,

You heard correctly.

Lanny J. Flynn, P.E., S.E.
Regional Engineer
AISC Marketing, Inc.
email: flynn(--nospam--at)aiscmail.com

----- Original Message -----
From: Evan Jorgensen <EJorgensen(--nospam--at)eqe.com>
To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Sent: March 31, 2000 9:15 AM
Subject: Re: Seismic Provisions


>
>
> I've heard that these provisions were recently adopted by the Los Angeles
City
> and Los Angeles County Building Departments in lieu of Chapter 22 of the
UBC.
> Can anyone confirm this?
>
> Evan Jorgensen
>
>
> ____________________Reply Separator____________________
> Subject:    Re: AISC Seismic provisions
> Author: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
> Date:       3/30/00 10:29 AM
>
>
>
> It's nice to know that the 2000 IBC references the latest AISC Seismic
> Provisions.  However, that's a future code, not adopted by any
jurisdictions
> yet.  The original question was concerned with the legally adopted 1997
UBC
> which we are legally required to use in California until probably the
middle of
> 2002.
>
> Rick Drake, SE
> Fluor Daniel, Aliso Viejo, CA
>
>
>
>