Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: ASD vs. LRFD

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Friends,

I'm sorry.  I responded before my first cup of coffee.  I meant to
say...

1.  I use ASD only! 

Thanks,  Mike Ritter, PE

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Fountain Conner [SMTP:fconner(--nospam--at)pcola.gulf.net]
> Sent:	Wednesday, April 26, 2000 8:23 AM
> To:	seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org; smaxwell(--nospam--at)engin.umich.edu
> Subject:	Re: ASD vs. LRFD
> 
> 
> I use ASD only.
> 
> Fountain E. Conner, P.E.
> Gulf Breeze, Fl. 32561
>    Phone 850-932-5547
>    Fax      850-934-1916
> 
> ----------
> > From: Scott E Maxwell <smaxwell(--nospam--at)engin.umich.edu>
> > To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
> > Subject: ASD vs. LRFD
> > Date: Tuesday, April 25, 2000 10:20 PM
> > 
> > First, let me apologize to the rest of the list for opening this can
> of
> > worms again.
> > 
> > I am doing and informal survey to see how many people still use ASD.
> > I am NOT trying find which method is better or why, but just trying
> to 
> > see how many people have made the switch.
> > 
> > Now, a simple question for you...which of the following best
> describes
> the
> > use of steel design methods in your offce:
> > 
> > 1) Only use ASD
> > 
> > 2) Only use LRFD
> > 
> > 3) Mainly use ASD but some LRFD
> > 
> > 4) Mainly use LRFD but some ASD
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > Scott Maxwell, SE, PE
> 
>