RE: Grade 50 Steel Designation[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- To: "'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'" <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
- Subject: RE: Grade 50 Steel Designation
- From: Charlie Carter <carter(--nospam--at)aiscmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 14:52:33 -0500
ASTM A992 is the way to go today for wide-flange shapes. See this link for the details about why.
Hope this helps.
From: Ritter, Mike [mailto:mritter(--nospam--at)lgt.lg.com]
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2000 1:20 PM
Subject: Grade 50 Steel Designation
We typically put a note on our drawings that says steel (WF shapes) are
to be ASTM A572, Grade 50. However, we recently had a peer reviewer say
that we should probably specify ASTM A992.
I spoke with a contact at a local steel fab shop, and he said that the
992 is probably more readily available, but is no less expensive than
the 572. The 992 is the "dual certification" steel.
Any comments? What do you guys specify? Is there a reason to specify
one over the other if we're getting 50 ksi either way?
Thanks in advance,
Michael D. Ritter, PE******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) to the list, send email to
* admin(--nospam--at)seaint.org and in the body of the message type
* "join seaint" (no quotes). To Unsubscribe, send email
* to admin(--nospam--at)seaint.org and in the body of the message
* type "leave seaint" (no quotes). For questions, send
* email to seaint-ad(--nospam--at)seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org ********
- Prev by Subject: Grade 50 Steel Designation
- Next by Subject: RE: Grade 50 Steel Designation
- Previous by thread: Grade 50 Steel Designation
- Next by thread: RE: Grade 50 Steel Designation