Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: What does AISC's Research Show? (Was: ASD vs. LRFD)

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE.

Let's N O T get into a debate on which country has the better engineers!!

I'll just have to unsubscribe again :o(.

Regards,

Bill Allen, S.E. (CA #2607)
ALLEN DESIGNS
Laguna Niguel, CA
http://www.AllenDesigns.com


||-----Original Message-----
||From: Mike Valley [mailto:mtv(--nospam--at)skilling.com]
||Sent: Monday, May 01, 2000 1:32 PM
||To: seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org
||Cc: wlpolhemus(--nospam--at)sbinfra.com
||Subject: RE: What does AISC's Research Show? (Was: ASD vs. LRFD)
||
||
||Bill:
||
||Are you playing the devil's advocate or are you really so provincial?
||
||IF, in fact, there is a design approach that is both easier to use AND
||more accurate (thus holding out economic benefits to both engineer and
||owner), it seems like the height of foolishness to ignore it simply
||because it wasn't developed by Americans.
||
||At the risk of stepping on your patriotic fervor, I believe that if
||you examine the world scene without regard to national boundaries you
||will find that "most of the preeminent engineers in the world" DO NOT
||"come to the U.S.A. to study AND to work."  PERHAPS close to half of
||the "preeminent engineers" study OR work in the U.S. at some time.  I
||say perhaps because I haven't seen any real evidence to that effect.
||Basing that conclusion on what is reported by the American media is
||faulty unless your definition of "preeminent" is "what I personally
||know about."
||
||As a member of the International Association for Bridge and Structural
||Engineering, I can assure you that the U.S. does not have a monopoly
||on impressive engineering.
||
||-Mike
||
||- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
||Michael Valley, P.E., S.E.                   E-mail: mtv(--nospam--at)skilling.com
||Skilling Ward Magnusson Barkshire Inc.              Tel:(206)292-1200
||1301 Fifth Ave, #3200,  Seattle  WA 98101-2699      Fax:        -1201
||
||> -----Original Message-----
||> From: Polhemus, Bill [mailto:wlpolhemus(--nospam--at)sbinfra.com]
||> Sent: Monday, May 01, 2000 10:57 AM
||> To: 'seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org'
||> Subject: RE: What does AISC's Research Show? (Was: ASD vs. LRFD)
||>
||>
||> But the question becomes:
||>
||> Lead who?
||>
||> Follow what?
||>
||> Get out of WHOSE way?
||>
||> The problem with this view is that we are typically designing U.S.
||> structures for U.S. sites and U.S. clients. Therefore, it
||> becomes moot
||> whether the Canadian steel design code is better, unless
||> you're designing
||> for Canada.
||>
||> What is the size of the market for structural engineering
||> services in
||> Canada?
||>
||> And while we're at it, why is it that most of the
||> preeminent engineers in
||> the world seem to like to come to the U.S.A. to study AND
||> to work? Do you
||> think they really fret about "neanderthal design codes" in
||> the process? Do
||> you think there's something else going on in their minds
||> unrelated to such
||> concerns?
||>
||> At the risk of sounding like one of the Buchanan Brigades:
||>
||> U.S.A. First, Last and Always!
||
||
||