I agree! Five to seven years should be plenty for a building code. Important
advancements (typically only seismically oriented) can be dealt with on a
supplementary basis. Rewriting the code just for the fun of it only
perpetuates a bureaucracy and really does not serve in the publics best
One clear example: how many jurisdictions adapt every new code every three
years? We are still dealing with plenty that are on UBC '94!
Shafat Qazi wrote:
> Dear List members:
> I was thinking, do we really need a new building code every three years?
> Really, I do not see new stuff coming up so fast anyway. I feel that if we
> change the cycle from three to five years, we probably will have better
> codes that will go through proper review process. Plus less confusion in
> our Industry. By the time we get to know the new code, we are then
> presented with a new one. This leaves us open to more errors.
> Your take on it?
> Shafat Qazi, P.E.
> SEAINT Admin