Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Roger Turk and Re: Question on "Seismic

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
On May 25, 2K, E.V. Leyendecker wrote:

>>Mr. Turk,

I am puzzled by the last paragraph of your email.  I am not aware of the
maps or references you are referring to when you talk about the USGS map
values being divided by 4 or of the criticisms from SEAOC about map values
being too low.   To my knowledge, no such references exist. Would you
please provide the references you are describing for the benefit of me and
other users of this site?<<

On July 14, 1998, I received a packet of maps with the cover sheet stating:  

Maps 6, 8, 10 and 12 show spectral accelerations for parts of California in 
excess of 300%g.  I recall seeing (an)other map(s) that had accelerations of 
close to 4g.

The criticism of the maps by SEAOC was reported in Engineering News-Record.  
IIRC, the report was on a BSSC meeting (Kansas City?) and the criticism was 
that the maps then published by USGS did not show the actual accelerations 
that would be experienced in an earthquake, but 1/4 the actual 
accelerations.  I have been unable to find my clipping of that article, but I 
am sure that it will show up when I least expect it.

A. Roger Turk, P.E.(Structural)
Tucson, Arizona