Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: proper weld metal notes

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

I have just made the same modification to the general notes that company
that I am at now.  Most companies around this are call for electrodes of
"E70XX".  I took the welding seminar done by Bob Shaw of SSTC (one of the
best seminars that I have ever participated in...especially since most
welding stuff, other that "this is the symbol for a fillet weld", is not
covered in most undergrad least not mine).  He emphasized
the same point that specifying an "E70XX" electrode is strictly speaking
also specifying the weld process.

One slight modification that you might want to make to your modified weld
specification statement is to include that the weld material should be
"low hydrogen".  That is another item that I picked up from that seminar.
I suppose that their might be welds that you might not want low hydrogen
filler material, but if my memory serves me still, then most welds should
be with low hydrogen filler.

I am sure that Bob Shaw (he participates on the list also) can provide
more info, if he so desires.

Scott Maxwell

On Fri, 2 Jun 2000, Dionysios J. Pantazis wrote:

> while in the process of revising some general notes, i was looking at the
> march issue of modern steel construction, at the third of the series on "Are
> You Properly Specifying Materials?" by charlie carter.
> (this is a very well
> written and comprehensive article series. thanks to charlie and aisc for
> makeing back-issues available online)
> here is the section on weld metal:
> "Weld Metal
> The appropriate weld metal is as summarized in ANSI/AWS D1.1-98 Table 3.1 
> for the various combinations of base metal specification and grade and
> electrode 
> specification. Weld metal with a tensile strength FEXX = 70 ksi is most
> common."
> i do not understand the designation FEXX. 
> i do not want to call out an electrode designation for fear of being
> 'accused' of dictating a welding process. from table of base metal/filler
> metal in d1.1, it is obvious that the electrode classification varies by
> process and rightly so i suppose.
> wouldn;t it be much simpler to state something like: 
> tia
> Dennis Pantazis
> 312-274-2406 voice
> mailto:dpantazis(--nospam--at)