Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Steel Connections

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

     Who signs the checks you cash? As long as there is no safety risks I 
believe in doing as the "BOSS" wants. By the way it works well at home too. If 
the actual load is larger you show the actual load. The slight pain I feel for 
the client in cases like this is more then over ridden by loyalty to my 
employer ( Old School Thinking). If the issue is safety then there is no 
question, always go with safety. If it really bothers you find a new job.

-----Original Message-----
From:	James Lane, P.E. [SMTP:jamesalane(--nospam--at)]
Sent:	Tuesday, June 27, 2000 3:54 PM
To:	seaint(--nospam--at)
Subject:	Steel Connections

Need some response to this one. Have a engineer wanting to use reactions
based on allowable load tables in steel book. I want to show the actual
reactions on the documents and have done so in past employment. Is the
company being unreasonable in making me adhere to this policy.

My argument is the following:
1. Short beams result in high reactions that are in excess of what is
2. Fabricators like the actual reaction loads on the beams.
3. I feel we are doing the client a disservice by making the fabricator
follow the load tables in the steel book. Since this would mean coping and
adding plates to alot of 8 and 10 inch short span beams.

Am I off base on this one?

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at