Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

RE: Pre-Eng. Steel Bldg Moment Ftg.w/ Tie-Rods;& Base PL. Shear

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Concrete encased steel will not create a moment or create corrosion problems
if the interface is detailed properly.  We have extended columns on projects
and it has worked well.  I agree however, that it may not be the best
alternative in all conditions.  Obviously, the decreased cost of the
foundations would be offset by the increased cost of the building frame.
While simplifying the foundations, extending the columns increases the
design moments and forces on the building frame.  (In Ed's case, extending
the columns was not an option since the building was already fabricated.)
The only reason I suggested it is that I saw it as one option that would
serve to eliminate a number of design problems Ed was encountering.  I have
found that often times eliminating problems is easier than trying to solve

Jim Hagensen, SE

-----Original Message-----
From: ad026(--nospam--at) [mailto:ad026(--nospam--at)]
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 8:08 PM
To: seaint(--nospam--at)
Subject: Re: Pre-Eng. Steel Bldg Moment Ftg.w/ Tie-Rods;& Base PL. Shear

> From: James Hagensen <JHAGENSEN(--nospam--at)>

> If you have the option, I would simplify the design and alleviate a number
> of your concerns by extending the metal building columns by 2' (or
> is required) and set the column on the footing.  The portion of steel
> below grade can be encased in concrete for protection.  Just another
> to consider.

Concrete encased steel will a) create a moment connection for which
neither the column or foundation will be designed and/or b) create a
potential for corrosion where you least want it - hidden inside 2' of
cracked concrete buried in a constantly moist environment.

Paul Ransom, P. Eng.
Burlington, Ontario, Canada
<mailto:ad026(--nospam--at)> <>