Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: English 101

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
What about flammable and inflammable... ???

and everyone knows we "park in driveways and drive in parkways....."

jim korff, pe


----- Original Message -----
From: "fturner" <fturner(--nospam--at)quiknet.com>
To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: English 101


> Sorry I was out for the last couple days and missed this critical
> development.
>
> Bill, if you agree with the definition of "aseismic" as "almost free of
> earthquakes" as promoted by B. Bolt in his books titled "Earthquakes",
then
> "aseismic" is indeed "seismic" albeit just a wee bit.
>
> Several Japanese-translated publications use the aseismic term. Along
those
> lines, I wonder if some of the Japanese think we are trying to repair and
> reoccupy old buildings when the translation for the term "rehabilitation"
is
> applied literally...
>
> Fred
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Barry Welliver" <wellive(--nospam--at)attglobal.net>
> To: <seaint(--nospam--at)seaint.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2000 6:11 AM
> Subject: Re: English 101
>
>
> > Gosh, is there some inside meaning I'm missing about this retrofit vs
> > rehabilitation controversy?? Perhaps we should retrofire a discussion
like
> this
> > on the Structualist??
> >
> > Barry H. Welliver
> >
> > Bill Allen wrote:
> >
> > > Fred-
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > But, the definition you have provided sounds pretty "non-seismic" to
me.
> > >
> > > Besides, wouldn't "aseismic" have to mean either "seismic" or
> "non-seismic"?
> > >
> > > Get off that fence :o).
>
>
>
>