Need a book? Engineering books recommendations...

Return to index: [Subject] [Thread] [Date] [Author]

Re: Use of foreign engineers... ET AL....

[Subject Prev][Subject Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Maybe what we need now is another certification to go along with CE/PE/SE .
That would be LS, for Language Skills. There could be LS I, LS II, LS III,
etc. ;o)

I'm an LS IV myself... and have been having a ball reading the foreign
language messages.

I would be happy to translate them for you - at a hefty price naturally

OOPS... I guess I shouldn't have used the expression "having a ball".....  I
don't however believe that it is necessary to speak english flawlessly to
crunch numbers and exchange engineering knowledge.

Plus...if engineering slang is an obstruction to good engineering, you
wouldn't want to work with any australians, new zealanders, british,
canadian or other english speaking fellows. Heck, you wouldn't work with
anyone outside of your neighborhood...

Plus, I believe in my 7+ years of undergrad/grad education, plus 20+ years
of "continuous education and CPD's....over 75% of my professors were foreign
born .

I would hate to send my son to a school where only US nationals could

So...try to keep things in perspective.... and send me a list of "american
engineering slang" as I am not sure what that would be..... (Does KIPS count

jim korff, pe   (that's pe, for poor engineer)

----- Original Message -----
From: <MSSROLLO(--nospam--at)>
To: <seaint(--nospam--at)>
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: Use of foreign engineers

> Seems this thread has gone around a few days.  I have read most of the
> and the arguments appear valid for foreign or or Non-foreign engineers.
> The things I run into daily that are the hardest to deal with are:
> 1.  understanding a Client's needs and wants
> 2.  communication in general
> 3.  having people understand that all engineering work in this country can
> become legal work for someone else.
> 4.  getting true "number-crunching" engineers to understand the need to
> maintain some kind of time-frame.  To me a number cruncher is that group
> does not like the Client interface portion of this business but enjoys the
> technical aspect of it
> With that in mind, it becomes difficult to work with US engineers or
> grads that do not understand these 4 basic daily problems I encounter.  If
> you factor in using foreign engineers, some of these basics get harder.
> Communication gets more difficult.  Working in different buildings in the
> same city is difficult, making it different countries adds to this
> We use so much slang and take it for granted in the US.  In addition to
> while speaking to a person who has English as a second language, sometimes
> are into our 2nd or 3rd sentence, while they are still processing the 1st
> one.  I personally do not have a 2nd language, but can imagine that I
> process info slightly slower if it was not my native language.   You can
> a problem with any American that does not have a good command of the
> and writing skills.
> The legal aspect is very serious to us, but some countries may not feel so
> compelled to worry about it if their country does not follow the old
> motto " a car in every garage and a lawsuit for everyone"
> The time frame ALWAYS appears to be an issue with number crunchers.  If
> prefer doing the technical aspect, but not the Client/business end of
> engineering, they may not be so easy to work with on timeframe.  This
> to be true regardless of which country someone comes from.  So by
> predominantly hiring foreign labor for this task, it may make them appear
> harder to work with.  In fact, they are no harder to work with, but you
> hired 100% of them for that task.   Maybe you have hired only 50% or 60%
> Americans for the same task.
> Incidentally, I am non-US born but my father was military.  I moved to US
> when I was 5 or 6.
> Ron Martin
> Tuscaloosa, AL